The Rise of Electric Vehicles — Reading
Passage
A The electric car is not a new answer to an old problem; it is an old answer that lost. In 1900 roughly a third of the cars on American roads ran on electricity, and electric taxis worked the streets of London and New York. They were quiet, clean and easy to start, at a time when a petrol engine required a hand crank capable of breaking a wrist. What defeated them was not the motor but the battery, together with two developments: cheap oil, and Henry Ford's assembly line, which made petrol cars cost roughly a third as much as electric ones by 1912. B The obstacle remained the same for a century. A battery stores far less energy per kilogram than petrol, so early electric cars were heavy, slow and short-ranged. The change came from consumer electronics rather than from the motor industry: lithium-ion cells developed for laptops and phones fell in price by roughly ninety per cent between 2010 and 2023 while improving in density. Every claim about electric vehicles rests ultimately on that curve, and on whether it continues. C The environmental accounting is more complicated than either side usually admits. Manufacturing an electric car produces more emissions than manufacturing a petrol one, largely because of the battery, so a new electric vehicle begins its life in deficit. It repays that debt through use, and the point at which it moves ahead depends almost entirely on the electricity it is charged with. On a grid dominated by renewables the break-even arrives within a year or two; on a coal-heavy grid it may take most of the vehicle's life. The vehicle is only ever as clean as the system behind the socket. D Materials present a harder problem than emissions. Batteries require lithium, nickel, cobalt and graphite, and both mining and refining are geographically concentrated in ways that make supply politically fragile. Cobalt in particular has been associated with hazardous and child labour in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Manufacturers have responded by reducing cobalt content and adopting lithium-iron-phosphate chemistries that use none, which is genuine progress rather than public relations, though it trades away some energy density. E Adoption has not been limited by the vehicles themselves. Surveys consistently identify charging, not range, as the decisive worry — and specifically charging for people without a driveway. A household with off-street parking charges overnight at low cost and rarely thinks about it; a household in an apartment depends on public infrastructure that is unevenly distributed and considerably more expensive per unit of electricity. The transition has therefore been socially uneven in a way that mirrors existing housing advantage. F Second-hand markets are where the transition will be decided, because most people never buy a new car. Uncertainty about battery degradation initially depressed used values sharply. Evidence has since accumulated that modern packs lose capacity slowly — commonly under two per cent a year — and manufacturers now warrant them for eight years or more, but perceptions have moved more slowly than the data. G What is genuinely settled is direction. Every major manufacturer has committed to electrification and several markets have legislated end dates for new combustion sales. What remains open is pace, and whether electrification is treated as a substitution of one private car for another or as part of a broader reduction in car dependence. A city that replaces every petrol car with an electric one still has the same congestion, the same road space given over to parking, and the same tyre and brake particles, which are now a larger source of urban particulate pollution than exhausts. H Battery recycling has emerged as a further complication that early electric-vehicle optimism tended to skip over. A retired electric-car battery still holds a substantial share of its original capacity, and a growing second-life industry repurposes them for stationary storage — smoothing renewable generation on the electricity grid — before the cells reach true end of life and are dismantled for materials. Lithium, cobalt and nickel can all be recovered, and recycling rates are improving as dedicated facilities scale up, but the economics still depend heavily on metal prices and on battery chemistry: some newer, cheaper chemistries contain less of the valuable metals that made recycling profitable in the first place, which could paradoxically make the batteries harder to recycle economically even as they make the cars themselves cheaper to build. Mining companies and environmental groups remain in open disagreement about whether recycling can realistically supply enough material to meet demand as the vehicle fleet grows, or whether new mining, with its own well-documented environmental and labour costs, remains necessary regardless of how efficient recycling becomes. Neither side currently has the data to settle the question conclusively.
বাংলা অনুবাদ জমা দেওয়ার পর দেখা যাবে — আগে ইংরেজিতে বোঝার চেষ্টা করুন।