Artificial Light and Human Health — Reading

Passage

A Artificial light is unusual among environmental pollutants in being almost entirely welcome. Nobody campaigns for dirtier air, but street lighting is requested by residents, funded willingly and associated with safety and modernity. It is also the fastest-spreading form of environmental change on the planet: satellite measurements indicate artificially lit area and radiance have grown by roughly two per cent a year, and ground-based observation of star visibility suggests the night sky has been brightening considerably faster than satellites detect. B That discrepancy has a technical cause worth understanding. The satellite sensors most used for this work are largely blind to blue wavelengths, and the global switch from orange sodium lamps to white LEDs has shifted emission towards exactly those wavelengths. From orbit, a city that replaces its lamps can appear to have grown dimmer while an observer standing in it sees a brighter sky. Blue light also scatters more in the atmosphere, so the same quantity produces more skyglow, spreading the effect far beyond the lit area itself. C The efficiency of LEDs was expected to reduce total light emission and has generally not done so. Because light became cheaper per unit, more of it was installed, for longer, over wider areas — a pattern economists recognise as a rebound effect and observe across many efficiency improvements. Savings that appear certain in a per-lamp calculation dissipate at the level of a city. D Ecological consequences are documented across a wide range of species. Insect populations are drawn to lights and die there in numbers now considered a meaningful contributor to insect decline, which matters because insects underpin pollination and the food chain. Newly hatched sea turtles navigate towards the brightest horizon, historically the sea reflecting the sky and now frequently a coastal road. Migratory birds are disoriented by illuminated structures. Trees near street lights break bud earlier in spring, and nocturnal pollinators visit fewer flowers under artificial light, with measurable reductions in fruit set. E Human health effects are real but less dramatic than headlines imply. Nighttime exposure has been associated in observational studies with metabolic and hormonal effects, and shift work involving circadian disruption has been classified as a probable carcinogen. Observational studies of this kind, however, struggle to separate light exposure from the many things that accompany it, and the epidemiological picture is considerably less settled than the ecological one. F What distinguishes light from most pollution is that it does not persist. It ceases the moment the source is switched off, leaves no residue and requires no remediation. This makes it among the cheapest environmental problems to address, and several jurisdictions have shown as much: Slovenia legislated nationally in 2007, and Flagstaff, Arizona has enforced lighting ordinances since 1958 while remaining an ordinary functioning city. G Effective measures are specific rather than sweeping. Shielding fixtures so light falls downwards eliminates most skyglow at no cost to the illuminated surface. Warmer colour temperatures reduce scatter and ecological impact. Dimming or switching off in the small hours, when few people are about, saves money as well as darkness. Critically, the assumption that more light means less crime is not well supported by the evidence; the most rigorous studies find effects that are small, inconsistent and dependent on context. H Astronomers were among the earliest and remain among the most vocal advocates for reducing artificial light, for reasons that predate the health research by decades. A genuinely dark sky, unpolluted by scattered urban light, is now inaccessible to the majority of people on the planet; estimates suggest that a substantial share of the world's population has never seen the Milky Way from where they live. Observatories that once operated productively near major cities have relocated to remote sites or shut down entirely, and even remote sites face encroaching light domes from distant urban growth and, more recently, from the increasing brightness of satellite megaconstellations passing overhead. Dark-sky reserves — protected areas with strict lighting ordinances, certified by international astronomical bodies — have grown in number as a partial response, valued by both scientists and a growing astro-tourism industry. The astronomical case for reducing light pollution is in one sense simpler than the health case: the effect is visible, immediate and uncontested, unlike the more disputed physiological claims. It has, however, proven no more effective at actually slowing the growth of artificial light, which continues to increase in most of the world year on year.

বাংলা অনুবাদ জমা দেওয়ার পর দেখা যাবে — আগে ইংরেজিতে বোঝার চেষ্টা করুন।